Twitter Updates

What People Say:
"I never thought I'd read the phrase Crazy Politico's Rantings in the NYT. I'll bet they never thought they'd print anything like that phrase either." TLB

Blogroll Me!

My Blog Rolls

American Flag Bloggers

American Flags

Sunday, May 14, 2006


If those on the left wonder about the motives of the "liberal leaders" of the Democratic party, go no further than this report at JudicialWatch.Org.

James Taranto, at Opinion Journal's "Best of the Web" points out Bill Clinton's first act in office, to push RU-486.

If that were all there was to the report, it probably wouldn't bother me, but when you read the language you'll understand (hopefully) the cynicism some of us feel when the left say's what they are doing is because they understand us better.
There have been 30 million abortions in this country since Roe v. Wade. Think of all the poverty, crime and misery...and then add 30 million unwanted babies to the scenario. We lost a lot of ground during the Reagan-Bush religious orgy. We don't have a lot of time left. . . .

The biblical exhortation to "be fruitful and multiply" was directed toward a small tribe, surrounded by enemies. We are long past that. Our survival depends upon our developing a population where everyone contributes. We don't need more cannon fodder. We don't need more parishioners. We don't need more cheap labor. We don't need more poor babies.
Remember, this is a letter to Bill Clinton, which helped spur him to his first official act in office.

It's that "concern for the poor" that should have folks wondering. The truth is, while the left panders the vote of the poor, and claims they are in their corner, this disgusting report, and the sentiment behind it should show the disdain the "intellectual elite" actually feel for the folks they claim to be for.

Robosquirrel has a much longer, and more eloquent take on this. Thanks for the link to the article!

Technorati Tags: , , ,, , , ,


Blogger Robosquirrel said...

Oh, and thanks for the link, Crazy P!

3:33 PM  
Blogger shoprat said...

One of the most ignored facts about liberal organizations is that Planned Parenthood was formed to prevent blacks and other undesirables from reproducing and it is working well from their point of view.

8:49 PM  
Blogger Paula said...

Abortion will be around as long as birth control methods are imperfect. PP is a good thing for poor women, some of whom can barely take care of the children they ALREADY have. I'd rather my tax dollars pay for their abortion than 18 years of welfare.

10:56 PM  
Blogger Little Miss Chatterbox said...

Wow!!! Despicable is too light of a word. It just makes me ill. I also wish more people knew what a racist Margaret Sanger was who started planned parenthood. She wanted to abort poor babies and black babies to weed them out of society. Despicable is right!!

11:55 PM  
Blogger The Conservative UAW Guy said...

I see Paula agrees with the point made by shoprat (that he doesn't agree with).

Death before poverty?
Does that mean it's ok to go kill the homeless, too?

Liberals scare me...

Great post, CP.

10:00 AM  
Blogger Paula said...

Nope cuz I don't define "person" as a clump of cells smaller than a plum. I guess you're anti-war, huh? (Oh, that's different.) Next.

11:17 AM  
Blogger The Conservative UAW Guy said...

Peter Singer would be proud of you, Paula.

1:02 PM  
Blogger Rebekah said...

Paula, how can you even compare killing an unborn baby to killing terrorists who would murder every one of us?
The baby hasn't done anything -- war between men is one thing; killing a defenseless child is another.

As for your post, CP, well, obviously this shows Bill Clinton's true colors. "Safe, legal and rare"? Right. That will never happen as long as there's zero accountability and unlimited abortion.

8:39 PM  
Blogger Paula said...

So we've only killed terrorists, huh? No one else?? I guess the little kids in the car that didn't stop at a checkpoint were terrorists, too.

Peter Singer wouldn't like me at all, hon. Do some more reading.

8:50 PM  
Blogger Crazy Politico said...

Paula makes a good point about abortion, which I didn't touch on the post. The reason I didn't is as much as her reasoning makes sense, it's the disingenuous "choice" argument that I was pointing to.

As much as certain groups want us to believe that the reason they support abortion is "choice", the letters from the Clinton library show it to be otherwise.

On the subject of terrorists, no the kids probably weren't terrrorists. Then again, I got to live with carrying out the dead and dying when we used the theory of don't load the guns so you don't scare folks in Beruit. While neither system is perfect, I'll take one that allows me to protect myself when folks run the checkpoint, instead of picking up bodies.

9:42 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

"war between men is one thing; killing a defenseless child is another"

No defenseless children ever die in a "war between men" (never mind that we have women serving in the military now, have had for the longest time).

What planet are you people from?

Like Paula and PP (I agree totally with her point), I support methadome clinics as an alternative to crime and the spread of HIV. Maybe that will make a few right-wing heads explode here as well. If it doesn't, have a look at this:

11:12 PM  
Blogger on-my-mind said...

Paula - "I guess the little kids in the car that didn't stop at a checkpoint were terrorists, too." - It's the terrorist parents who brought those children into an environment which they knew was dangerous. They usually are the ones who make it dangerous. Blame the parents, not the soldiers.

I stopped by your site and read a few of the "appetizers". Kindred minds? Perfume causes me migraines; I often have nightmares about drowning; I wanted to be a writer (and might do it after the kids are grown); I also prefer to watch other people surf.

Have a good day, ma'am.

3:01 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home